Ruger SR1911
Editor’s Rating
Users’ Rating (Click a star to rate this gun.)
loading...
Summary: Mike Boyle’s review and rating of Ruger’s SR1911 pistol, including a range report, Ruger’s MSRP and photos, and user ratings and comments. (Click here to see all Boyle’s gun reviews.)
Editor’s Review
Without question, the 1911 pistol is the most copied and imitated pistol of all time. It has served as springboard for other designs, grown and shrunk, and been rendered from various types of weight-saving materials. Various manufacturers have tinkered with its innards, hoping to create a better mousetrap.
Some of these variants have filled a useful niche, but most have proven inferior to the original. Like most pistoleros, I own and shoot many different types of handguns, but I always come back to the 1911, and the ones I favor don’t deviate a great deal from the original Browning design.
Ruger’s new SR1911 meets this description. Although the SR1911 isn’t really “new,” Ruger does this pistol right, which is far more important.
Ruger has actually been at the 1911 game for some time. Ruger turns out major components for other firearms companies and has been building the frames for one highly regarded manufacturer of 1911s for several years. Would a totally Ruger-built 1911 have some appeal? The powers-to-be at Ruger thought so.
Pistol Particulars
The SR1911 is a full-size .45 ACP crafted of stainless steel that embodies many classic features. The slide is crafted from bar stock, as is the barrel, while the frame is cast. There was once a notion that a cast frame is somehow inferior to a milled one, but it really hasn’t played out that way.
Casting makes for very precise tolerances and low manufacturing costs. It also allows a manufacturer to do things that would prove impossible or too costly using other methods. Example: The plunger tube on the SR1911 is integral to the frame instead of staked on. On occasion, staked tubes have been known to come loose, causing all sorts of problems.
The SR1911’s external dimensions are pretty much on par with other service-size 1911s. Total length measures 8.67″ with a barrel length of 5″. The SR1911 stands 5.45″ tall and weighs 39 oz. It’s external geometry is identical to other 1911s, so holster availability and fit will not be a problem.
Traditional features include an internal extractor and rear slide serrations. The SR1911 utilizes a standard plug-style guide rod, just as John Browning intended. Dinosaur that I am, I’ve never warmed up to full-length guide rods on a 1911 that just make takedown and reassembly more difficult and offer no tangible advantage on a defensive pistol.
Likewise, a standard barrel bushing is also part of the package. The bushing’s fit was snug, but I had no problem removing it without using the provided bushing wrench.
The frame-mounted safety and slide stop are both slightly extended. A beavertail grip safety with a palm swell is also part of the mix. The beavertail prevents hammer bite, while the palm swell ensures safety deactivation should you take a hasty grip.

I, for one, was happy to see that the SR1911 does not utilize the superfluous Series 80-style firing pin safety. Instead, Ruger employed a low-mass titanium firing pin, which should eliminate an inertia discharge due to a dropped gun.
Sights include a low-profile Novak rear sight and front post in the popular three-dot pattern. Standard Colt dovetails are cut into the slide, and this makes fitting of aftermarket sights a snap.
Factory specs call for a trigger weight between 4–5.5 lbs. I didn’t have a trigger scale during my informal test, but I would guesstimate trigger pull on my sample ran just a little south of 5 lbs. The skeletonized aluminum trigger features an adjustable over travel stop, and my sample had very little slack before it dropped the hammer. The hammer, too, is a skeletonized affair with an oval slot.
The flat mainspring housing is nicely checkered for a positive hold. The hard rubber stocks on my sample contributed to a non-slip grip. The black grips, along with the bead blasted grey/silver finish, help give the SR1911 a handsome, yet serious business-like appearance. (Note: The pistol will apparently ship with wood grips but also include the black Hogue rubber grips.)
Two magazines, one holding seven rounds and the other taking eight rounds, come with the SR1911. I’ll confess that the logic of different capacities is lost on me, but I’m a happy camper any time I get more than one magazine with a 1911.
Trigger Time
Back in December, I traveled to Gunsite Academy to get some hands-on experience on the SR1911. I had the opportunity to run more than 400 rounds through the SR1911 and was able to form some opinions on the latest spin of this classic pistol.
The SR1911 did not disappoint. I experienced a single stoppage that I quickly cleared, and other than that, reliability was absolutely perfect. I fired mostly 230-grain ball loads, but my test pistol also digested a small quantity of Hornady JHPs without missing a beat.
In fast-paced combat shooting, the SR1911 really began to shine. As long as I held up my part of the bargain, I was able to place shots in the middle of the target, and my experience was hardly unique among the other two dozen writers in attendance. After giving it our best throughout the afternoon, we returned to the range in the evening and gave the SR1911 a workout in low light.
The next opportunity at Gunsite, I spent a morning shooting the SR1911 at distances ranging from arms length all the way back to 25 yards. Although I wasn’t able to perform an official accuracy evaluation, I can’t dispute Ruger’s claim the pistol can shoot 1.5″ groups at 25 yards.
My final test drive consisted of multiple runs on the man-on-man shoot-off used in Gunsite’s 250 pistol class. Again, the SR1911 rose to the occasion. I thought the trigger was especially nice for a production gun, helping me in that never ending quest to shoot straight and true.
Final Thoughts
This pistol holds little in the way of surprises but performs every bit as good as pistols retailing for considerably more. At a manufacturer’s suggested retail price of $799, it’s only slightly more expensive than imported pistols that offer far less.
I don’t think I’m going out on a limb predicting that variants of the SR1911 are not too far down the road. A blackened stainless copy shouldn’t be too hard to pull off. Compact and enhanced versions are probably also in the cards.
Thirty years ago, there was one domestic manufacturer of 1911 pistols. Frankly, I’ve lost track of the number of outfits currently bringing this timeless pistol to the marketplace, but suffice to say, it’s a bunch. To make an impact in such a competitive market, your product better be good. In that regard, the Ruger SR1911 scores well.
Mike Boyle served as a captain with the New Jersey Division of Fish & Wildlife Bureau of Law Enforcement and recently retired after 27 years of service. Mike remains active, teaching recruit, in-service and instructor level classes at the police academy. He’s also on the board of directors of the International Association of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors.
![]()
The Specs
| Caliber | Capacity | BBL | OAL | Height | Width | Weight |
| .45 ACP | 7+1, 8+1 | 5″ | 8.67″ | 5.45″ | 1.34″ | 39 oz. |
![]()
MSRP: $799
![]()
|
Ruger Sr1911 (Impact Guns) |
$689.99
|
75 Responses to “Ruger SR1911”
Comment from Yuri
Time April 26, 2011 at 11:31 pm
Comment from Ron Carpenter
Time July 24, 2011 at 1:04 am
I think it is one of the finest 1911s i have ever owned.
I shot 1.5″ groups with it at 25 yards with 6grans of universal and a 230 grain lead .
I will put it up against any 1400.00 Kimber.
It is just as nice if not nicer and half the price !!!
Comment from Mark
Time July 27, 2011 at 6:25 pm
Comment from Mike
Time July 27, 2011 at 11:46 pm
Comment from jim edwards
Time July 30, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Is Ruger asleep at the wheel?
Comment from jim edwards
Time July 30, 2011 at 4:11 pm
Has Ruger dropped the ball on this one?
Comment from Scott Weatherford
Time August 13, 2011 at 12:38 pm
Actually, I suspect all the carbon-steel parts on these first-release guns may be vendor supplied, since theres a zillion sources for such parts and not having to tool-up in-house for every piece may be one of the factors behind the low price.
I have no idea what the production figures are for this model so far, but failure to meet the demand may be more a testament to the demand for the product, than an indication Ruger’s dropped the ball. Personally, I’d rather wait a bit to get a good gun, than have quality issues crop up, like those Smith & Wesson experienced in the ’70s, when trying to meet the demand for M66s, or more recently with PPKs.
Comment from JOHN
Time August 18, 2011 at 8:30 am
Comment from Dave
Time September 6, 2011 at 3:54 pm
Comment from Matthew
Time September 7, 2011 at 11:22 pm
Comment from Gary
Time October 2, 2011 at 4:52 pm
Comment from Roger torgerson
Time November 7, 2011 at 1:37 pm
Comment from jim edwards
Time November 8, 2011 at 11:11 am
Comment from Mark
Time November 14, 2011 at 7:41 pm
Comment from Chris
Time December 2, 2011 at 11:51 am
Comment from Randy
Time December 4, 2011 at 6:03 pm
Comment from Rick
Time December 23, 2011 at 10:22 pm
Comment from jim edwards
Time December 24, 2011 at 10:16 am
i still think that Ruger dropped the ball on this
one. Oh, well,all things come to he who waits.
Comment from bien pammit
Time January 30, 2012 at 11:51 pm
Comment from Jay
Time February 17, 2012 at 1:10 pm
Comment from anthony
Time February 24, 2012 at 1:50 pm
Comment from Bien Pammit
Time February 24, 2012 at 2:36 pm
Comment from Joy
Time February 25, 2012 at 5:22 pm
Jay
Comment from tomas
Time April 19, 2012 at 11:57 am
Comment from Dave
Time May 7, 2012 at 2:52 pm
Comment from John
Time May 29, 2012 at 11:02 pm
Comment from Bien Pammit
Time May 30, 2012 at 10:54 am
Comment from William Marlowe
Time June 9, 2012 at 11:05 am
Comment from Marc Gibson
Time June 12, 2012 at 10:43 am
Comment from Marc Gibson
Time June 12, 2012 at 10:46 am
Comment from Bosun Mike
Time July 6, 2012 at 9:01 am
Comment from Pat
Time August 1, 2012 at 8:52 pm
Comment from Kevin
Time August 15, 2012 at 1:39 am
Comment from w9lec
Time September 6, 2012 at 7:00 pm
Comment from Scott
Time September 7, 2012 at 12:27 am
Comment from Jay
Time September 7, 2012 at 12:48 pm
Comment from Kyle
Time September 8, 2012 at 2:53 pm
Comment from curious george
Time September 29, 2012 at 11:35 pm
Comment from curious george
Time September 29, 2012 at 11:40 pm
Comment from Jp
Time October 2, 2012 at 10:22 am
Comment from curioug george
Time October 2, 2012 at 11:16 am
Comment from Marc
Time October 2, 2012 at 12:33 pm
My SR1911 and my SR9C are fantastic and would not trade them for another brand. I would really like to hear your facts instead of your bias talk.
Comment from curioug george
Time October 2, 2012 at 2:04 pm
Comment from Marc
Time October 2, 2012 at 2:07 pm
Comment from curioug george
Time October 2, 2012 at 2:27 pm
Another example – I once was gently drift adjusting the rear sight on MK II pistol with a small brass hammer and noticed that the small brass hammer had slightly dented the reciever steel. I was rather surprised at this. I could give other examples but fanboys will only say ‘why would you do that’ or ‘who would do this’ or ‘are you a metal expert’ etc etc. I’m just saying this: Ruger steel is the softest steel I’ve seen used in firearms, and I’ve seen many firearms. If two handguns bump; the Ruger gets the scar every time.
Comment from curioug george
Time October 2, 2012 at 2:39 pm
Comment from Marc
Time October 2, 2012 at 2:43 pm
Comment from curioug george
Time October 2, 2012 at 2:55 pm
Comment from curioug george
Time October 2, 2012 at 2:59 pm
Comment from Marc
Time October 2, 2012 at 3:00 pm
Comment from curioug george
Time October 2, 2012 at 3:43 pm
Comment from Marc
Time October 2, 2012 at 7:55 pm
Comment from curious george
Time October 2, 2012 at 8:23 pm
Comment from Marc
Time October 2, 2012 at 8:33 pm
Comment from curioug george
Time October 3, 2012 at 9:12 am
Comment from curioug george
Time October 3, 2012 at 9:19 am
Comment from curioug george
Time October 3, 2012 at 9:27 am
“The Springfield Armory 1911 full-size GI model boasts a steel-forged frame, slide and barrel.”
Comment from Marc
Time October 3, 2012 at 10:13 am
Comment from curioug george
Time October 3, 2012 at 11:14 am
Comment from Jp
Time October 4, 2012 at 10:45 am
All have a great day!
Comment from Cliff Guttzman
Time October 4, 2012 at 2:58 pm
Comment from curioug george
Time October 5, 2012 at 8:45 am
Comment from Jp
Time October 5, 2012 at 9:56 am
Thank you Mr. Browning where ever you are!
I also, after a complete rework and inspection of the one I own, SR1911, that Ruger more than likely only manufactures in house, the slide and frame, all else are over the counter parts that any of us can buy from god knows where!
Happy shooting one and all! Don’t forget to value that freedom either!
Comment from curioug george
Time October 5, 2012 at 12:48 pm
Comment from Jp
Time October 5, 2012 at 1:25 pm
Comment from curioug george
Time October 19, 2012 at 10:49 am
Comment from Delbert Pistole
Time October 24, 2012 at 7:40 am
Comment from curioug george
Time October 24, 2012 at 2:24 pm
Comment from Bruce Nielsen
Time November 24, 2012 at 8:39 pm
Comment from eric kessn
Time December 16, 2012 at 11:25 am
Comment from curious george
Time January 7, 2013 at 9:56 am
Comment from rob
Time March 26, 2013 at 5:15 pm
Comment from Marc
Time April 16, 2013 at 11:46 pm
Comment from DTXgunner
Time April 19, 2013 at 9:55 pm

















Comment from Spinelessplague
Time April 19, 2011 at 10:21 pm
http://www.woodburyoutfitters.com/The-Ruger-SR1911-Centerfire-Pistol-P11758C1728.aspx